I have wrote a post on the subject of the to string method of an object in general before, however in todays post I think I will take a moment to write about this subject when it comes to arrays alone. The to string method of an array will work okay when it comes to an array of primitives, however it will often fall short of expectations when it comes to an array of objects. When it comes to converting a complex array of objects into a string format it is often called for to create a custom helper function, or class prototype method to do so. It is also possible to create a custom to string method for an array, and when making a custom class that makes use of an array it is general a good idea to have a to string method as part of the prototype object.
If I am dealing with a simple array of primitives and I want a string value of the array I can often just call the to string method. The default to string method of the array prototype will often give me what I want when it comes to this, however often I might still want to use an alternative method to create a string value from an array.
When I am dealing with an array of objects this is often when the to string method will fall short, or at least the defaul to string method of the array prototype object.
One way to address the problem that I run into with the to string method is to just use a method like array map to create a custom array or privative values first. I can then just call the to string method of off the instance of the new array that is created from array map.
Another option would be to create a custom to string method. When doing this it is possible to monkey patch the array prototype with a custom array prototype, but generally that would not be a good idea, as it would effect this functionally everywhere in a page. However one thing that can be done is to create an own property of a single array instance without mutating the state of the prototype object of the Array class.
When it comes to making my own class that is separate from the array prototype I can of course create my own to string method for this new class of object, without worry about touching any built in prototype. Having a to string method is generally a good idea when it comes to creating any kind of class object, as it allows be th create whatever the standard string format of my custom class of object should be. While I am at it I should also make sure to create a value of method for the class also and use that to define what a number value should be for the class of object.
The array to string method is the default way to go about creating a string value from an array. However it is not the end all solution for this sort of thing, there are a number of other options to be aware of. Also in some cases it is possible that a custom solution will need to be made for create a string value of an object, in the form of some kind of helper function, or a custom to string method that is used in place of array to string one way or another.