However in some cases array length is just an object property that does not even reflect the highest indexed object key of the array, because there is nothing there actually. So in a way it is just a way of declaring an element size of sorts, but many of those elements can be undefined, the default value for an object key that is not there.
The length differs from the size of an array which may refer to the amount of data that an array might take up in memory. there is also what if often called the count of an array that refers to the number of actual declared elements in the array, and that array count might differ in many respects depending on how you go about counting elements.
An array has a length property and in most situations the length property is also the number of actual elements in the array as well. However this is not always the case depending on how you go about counting elements. So an arrays count of elements might differ from the length of the array depending on the methodology of how a developer might go about counting elements in an array. One way of putting it would be thinking of an empty liter sized bottle, it might be an empty bottle but it still has a capacity of one liter. The count of the liter could be the same as the length if we are counting empty space, otherwise it is not.
In addition to the length of an array, and the count of the elements in the array there is also the array index value. This is often a number or a string that can be easily converted to a number that reflects the index of a certain element in an array. That being said there are at least three general numerical values of interest when it cokes to working with an array then, the max capacity or array length, the element count, and the current index value when it comes to looping over the contents of an array.
In the above example I have an array that was created from an object that has numbered key value pairs, and a length property that has a value greater than the number of other keys in the object. Also the numbed keys of the object are going up by multiples of two, and there are four keys in the object aside from the length key. This hopefully helps to give a clear understanding of what the differences are between array length, count, and an index value.
When using a method like Array.push to add new elements to an array, the length will be updated each time. In the following example I am just creating an empty array with the array literal syntax, pushing in a new element for each iteration, and also logging the current length each time.
As expected the length of the array goes from one upwards to 5 as I am logging the length after pushing in new elements to it. Fairly simple of course, but in some situations things can get a little confusing when it comes to adding elements to an array in other ways, as well as when removing them.
So also as expected popping out old elements from an array will result in the length decreasing. Here again I have a very simple example where I am just removing elements from an array with the Array.pop method one at a time on each iteration of a loop. As this happens the length decreases with each iteration of the loop as elements are removed from the end of the array with Array.pop.
Take into account a basic example such as this for a moment.
Here we have an array with a length of 11, but in a way there is only 6 elements in the array. This is what I am talking about when it comes to the difference between array length and array count. The length of the array is just the highest defined index value of he array plus one, while the count of an array is the actual count of defined elements in the array.
So the length of an array can be found by simply taking a look at the current value of the length property of an array, but the count must be obtained by some other means such as using the Object.keys static method wich can be used to get an array of public keys of any object including arrays.
The Object.keys method will work fine for a simple example such as this, but in some cases it will result in unexpected results when dealing with an array that has some additional public keys attached to it.
So say I have an array that has some elements added to it that are attached to indexed key names as usual with an array, but then some that are attached to key names that are not numbered index key values but non numbed string values. This will result in what might be an undesired array count with Object.keys.
It is possible to set the length property of an array. When setting a length that is lower than the current length that will result in what would be expected which is the array will end up being truncated to that length that was set. Setting a higher length property will result in a situation in which any index values above the previous length will result in being undefined. This might result in unexpected behavior with some array methods like Array.forEach.
In other words something like this:
Understanding this can help eliminate confusion with some situations in which the length of an array is in fact really not the length of the array. In this section I will cover some more examples like this to help elaborate more with this.
It is possible to have an array that has a set length, but all of the elements are undefined. This is the case if the array is created from an object that just has a length property. A similar situation can happen if the array is created with the Array constructor syntax and given an argument that will be the length of the array.
Yet another good example of why it is that length differs from the actual element count of an array.
It is possible to set negative index values for an array. When doing so this might result in unexpected length values as negative index values will not be counted.
However as long as the index values are enumerable the Object.keys method can be used to get an array of enumerable keys for an object, including possible negative index values. Which would be one way to get the true index value if these negative index values are to be counted.
The Object.keys method can be used to get an array of enumerable key names of an object, and the Object.values method can be used to get an array of the corresponding values. Then there is Object.getOwnPropertyNames that can be used to get all of the objects own Property names even ones like length, and any additional key value pairs that are set to be not enumerable.
One drawback to using these methods as a way to obtain element count of an array is that if some additional named properties are added to the array that will effect the count, to resolve this a method that involves just counting the positive numbered keys of the array.
So one way of getting actual element count that comes to mind is to just loop from zero to the length of the array of vice versa and preform some kind of condition for each for each potential element to determine if there is actually something there or not.
This presents some issues of concern when it comes to arrays with a length property that might be set to a very high number for example. It is a silly waste of resources to loop over all those undeclared numbered key values, when I could find some way to just filter a list of declared key values that can be obtained via the Object.keys static method.
So another way to get the actual count of an array would be to still use a method like Object.keys, but filter the results of that method. The Array.filter method could be used as a way to create an array of Object keys that are numbered keys equal to or grater than that of zero. The length of that array could then be used as a way to determine the count or an array.
The expression could be tweaked to preform additional checks such as weather or not object keys that are declared but set to undefined should be counted or not.
When working with typed arrays the length property refers to the number of bit sized units the array is. For example if it is a Unit16Array and it has 3 elements the length of it is 3, and the byte length of it is 6.
The length of an array generally refers to the number of elements, or the highest index value plus one. It does not always refer to the the size of the array in terms of data.
This is of course a very untypical way of deleting elements from an array though. In fact I can not say I use the delete keyword very often, in fact at all in just about any project so far.
Although using the delete keyword to delete an array element will not effect length, deleting a property of an object that will be used to create an array might effect the resulting length of that array.