As of revision 125 pf threejs The Geometry Constructor has been removed which will result in code breaking changes for a whole Internet of threejs example. So this week I have been editing old posts, and writing some new ones on threejs, and I have noticed that I have not wrote a post on the buffer geometry constructor just yet. I have wrote one on the old Geometry Constructor that I preferred to use in many of my examples, but now that the constructor is no more I am going to need to learn how to just use the Buffer Geometry Constructor when it comes to making my own geometries.
The basic example of a buffer Geometry in the three.js documentation works okay as a starting point, but it does not cover every little detail when it comes to what I should be aware of when making a custom geometry. So in this post I will be going over the basic examples that I have worked out thus far when it comes to just working with some very simple starting points with a custom geometry using the buffer geometry constructor rather than the plain old geometry constructor.
This is a post on the buffer geometry constructor in three.js which was one of two options to create a custom geometry in three.js before r125, but after r125 is now they only way to do so when it comes to the core library by itself anyway. This is then not a getting started type post with three.js or any additional skills that are required before hand.
This first example is not all that different from that of the example that I have found at the official three.js documentation website. However I made an effort to try to make the example yet even more easy to follow by having the geometry be just a single triangle.
I then just added three points to the array by having just a linear collection of numbers where the first number is the x axis of the first point, the second element is y for the first point, the third is for the z value of the first point, and so on when it comes to additional points. I then just need to use the set attribute method of the buffer geometry instance of create the position attribute of the geometry passing the array of points as the first argument and the number 3 as the next argument.
I now just need to add this geometry to a mesh by calling the mesh constructor, and passing the geometry as the first argument, and then a material as the second argument. When it comes to a very basic example like this one, the basic material will work just fine for this simple example that is just a single face.
So if I take my basic example that I worked out above and switch to the normal material rather than the basic material, then I get nothing. That should be what is expected sense there is no normals array for the geometry just yet. There might be more then one way to go about making a normals array, but the quick and simple way might be to just call the compute vertex normals method of the geometry.
So how about material index values for a geometry that consists of more then one face? Well this is where the add group method comes into play as it can be used to create an array of group objects where each group object contains a material index property. For this example I am then going to want to have just a slightly more complex geometry in which I now have two triangle in space rather than just one. Sense that is the case I and then call the add group method twice to create two face objects for each triangle while doing so I can set what the material index values should be.
Now that I have that done when I create a mesh with this geometry I can now pass an array of materials, and each material will then be used for each face depending on the material index values.
Now it is time to see how a custom geometry works with a situation involving a little light, and the use of a materials that will respond to light. With that said this one might prove to be a little bit of a work in progress at least at the point that I started writing this post anyway. When I have this example up and running it seems to work okay, but the colors do not always look the way that I think they should as I move them around. A quick fix for this was to just add a little ambient light rather than just having a point light like I typically do in many of my examples.
I have a lot of work cut out for me when it comes to working on editing a lot of my old three.js content. A lot of my examples made use of the old geometry constructor, so They will need to be updated to work with the buffered geometry constructor if I want them to still work with late versions of three.js. The only other options would be to just make quick edits that mention what version of three.js I was using when I made they example which might prove to be a good temporarily fix when it comes to editing.
There might be more to work out when it comes to just some very basic examples like the ones that I worked out for this post when it comes to the various properties of a geometry and how they apply to various features of three.js. For now they seem to work okay, but I am sure that there will be some minor fixes for some of these examples when and if I get around to them.